Defence for driving without a licence

No. They have different origins and regime. Both may be criminally relevant when driving, but their requirements and accreditation documents are different.

The crime of article 384 does not require an additional dangerous maneuver in its typical modalities. The driving and the specific lack of qualification must be demonstrated.

Article 384 provides alternative imprisonment, fine or community work. Individualization and possible suspension require a study of the sentence and personal circumstances.

Getting it later does not erase the above facts. In addition, any existing judicial prohibition must be respected; its effects should be reviewed before taking action.

It is not possible to respond without examining the document, its authenticity, the qualification it provides and the form it is charged with. Not every irregularity of exchange amounts to a crime.

Professional activity does not create an automatic exception to judicial deprivation. Any request must be resolved by the appropriate legal means before driving.

Yes, if the aid integrates criminally relevant participation. It is not necessary to carry the steering wheel in order for conscious cooperation to be examined.

Not automatically. The technical characteristics and legal classification of the apparatus are important. It should be checked whether it fits the vehicles to which the type refers.

It depends on the circumstances of the route and the fact attributed. The private property label alone does not solve the scope of the road offence.

Yes. The defence can examine the file, communications and evidence of knowledge. An irregularity must relate to the elements of the offence.

Personal circumstances may be relevant in individualization or execution, but do not in themselves exclude a typical accredited conduction.

It may be considered whether the procedure and the prosecution meet its requirements. The evidence and consequences of accepting a conviction must be reviewed.

The subpoena, the available filing, the history of the DGT, court decisions and notifications help to identify which modality is attributed.

It can influence. Not every previous conviction has the same effect: its nature, relevance, cancellation and the requirements of each form of suspension must be examined.