Service
Advice on enforcement of sentences and fines
The defence continues after the sentence.
Related cases ↗Read moreSupreme Court case law
Combining sentences and the chronological requirement
One case of The Criminal Chamber related to criminal services.
Supreme Court · Second Chamber (Penal) · 2023
ECLI:ES:TS:2023:355
What the Supreme Court considered and decided
The Supreme Court upheld refusal to combine sentences because the chronological requirement was not satisfied. It examined the dates of the offences and the Judgments proposed for combination.
What this helps explain
It is not enough to collect several convictions: the time sequence must be reconstructed and the applicable legal limits checked.
Editorial summary from the official note of the CGPJ. It describes this resolution, without certifying the subsequent evolution of the procedure. It should be read with the legislation applicable to its facts, reforms and subsequent case law.
Related services
Service
Defence for drug trafficking in Madrid
Examining behavior and testing, without automatism.
Related cases ↗Read moreUnderstanding to Decide
Related legal terms
More favourable criminal lawCriminal penaltyCriminal fineDaily fine instalmentPayment of a fine in instalmentsSubstitute liability for an unpaid fineCommunity serviceSuspension of a sentenceExtinction of criminal liabilityDrug offences against public healthFinal judgmentEntry and searchInterception of communicationsRequest for reconsiderationReasoned judicial order