penal.infoBook a consultation ↗

Supreme Court case law

A dog attack and the duty of care

One case of The Criminal Chamber related to criminal services.

Supreme Court · Second Chamber (Penal) · 2024

ECLI:ES:TS:2024:3623

What the Supreme Court considered and decided

The court found gross negligence where a potentially dangerous dog, loose and without a muzzle, injured a child. It considered the duty to control the animal and the known risk to others.

What this helps explain

The penal qualification requires connecting the omission of precautions, the predictability of the attack and the harmful result.

Editorial summary from the official note of the CGPJ. It describes this resolution, without certifying the subsequent evolution of the procedure. It should be read with the legislation applicable to its facts, reforms and subsequent case law.

Related services

Understanding to Decide

Related legal terms

Back to the 100 tiles dThe Supreme Court ↗

Time to listen

Understanding your situation is the first step.

Consult with María Morales Elbaz, lawyer in Madrid.

Prepare for a consultation ↗