Anonymised case study
Unlawful occupation: dismissal before trial
A trial for an alleged minor offence of usurpation had been reported.
Read moreServices
Differentiating criminal and civil claims.
We review the title, possession, authorizations and reported conduct to identify the corresponding legal channel. Not every dispute over a property constitutes an offence of usurpation.
The usurpation, the break-in and the civil possessory conflicts are different figures. The answer depends on the nature of the property and the elements to be demonstrated.
Understanding to Decide
Anonymised case study
A trial for an alleged minor offence of usurpation had been reported.
Read moreAnonymised case study
A procedure for a possible minor offence of usurpation came to trial. Both the evidence and the existence of an indictment that could sustain a conviction had to be verified.
Read moreAnswers to guide you
18 Brief answers with references to official regulations.
No. The search protects the dwelling; the non-violent usurpation of article 245.2 refers to buildings that do not constitute it.
Consult this service ↗See FAQ ↗Protection is related to the space where private life develops. It does not depend solely on ownership or administrative registration.
It can be if it maintains that private life function. Its actual use must be analyzed; it is not ruled out just because it is not the usual dwelling.
No. They import their function, authorization, permanence, opposition of the holder and possible violence. The qualification requires a study of the facts.
Article 245.2 provides for a fine for his alleged unauthorized occupation of non-residential property, with the other legal requirements.
Article 245.1 provides for a different response and provides for penalties for violence. It must be distinguished from non-violent occupation.
No. A non-payment within a rental relationship does not in itself amount to an untitled entry. It is necessary to value contract, possession and avenues of claim.
No. A distinction should be made between civil disagreement over the use or possession of conduct that brings together all elements of an offence.
Action should not be taken without analysing the situation and the appropriate procedure. It can affect the possession or abode of others and generate responsibility.
Consult this service ↗See FAQ ↗Using them as a pressure can constitute coercion according to the facts. It is necessary to use the appropriate legal means of recovery.
It credits aspects of ownership, but does not in itself demonstrate a lack of authorization, abode, authorship and other elements of the offence.
Consult this service ↗See FAQ ↗Measures of protection or restitution may be considered in the proceedings, according to their requirements. There is no automatic concession for filing a complaint.
No. The procedure, the identification of occupants, the evidence and the necessary resolutions influence. An eviction with a uniform duration cannot be guaranteed.
Consult this service ↗See FAQ ↗The LECrim includes these offences among the possible scenarios, but the other requirements of the procedure must also be met. It's not automatic.
Yeah. We need to examine who authorized it, with what scope and what happened next. It is not the same to enter without consent as to discuss the completion of a title.
Consult this service ↗See FAQ ↗They may help to prove use and circumstances, but do not by themselves determine ownership, authorization or dwelling.
Yes, if you prove your reality and relationship to the facts. Restitution, reparation and other recoverable damages must be distinguished.
Consult this service ↗See FAQ ↗Title, contract and communications, previous rulings, real use of the property and evidence of access or damage allow to decide the appropriate route.
Consult this service ↗See FAQ ↗Family and successions
In Matrimonialistas you will find information about related civil actions and claims.
There is a dispute over the use of a property. Is every occupation dealt with in the same way? No. The facts, possession rights and whether the property is a dwelling must be distinguished.
Gather ownership or possession documents, contracts, communications and earlier court decisions. Explain who used the property and since when. A contractual disagreement requires a different review from entry or remaining without permission.
Criminal proceedings do not automatically replace civil procedures. The classification and possible measures depend on each situation's legal requirements. Avoid taking matters into your own hands through threats, utility disconnections or other actions that may create further legal problems.
At penal.info, we review the dispute and the appropriate route. Prepare a timeline of the property's use and complete documents. Identifying the situation correctly comes before choosing a particular solution.
Book an appointment with María Morales at penal.info.
Time to listen
Consult with María Morales Elbaz, lawyer in Madrid.